University Square Food Court. Really?

I was surprised.

            When I had to kill some time before an office opened on East Campus Mall, I was forced into the University Square Food Court for warmth (next to Lucky Apartments on the corner of University Ave. and N. Murray St.). Now, when I think food court, I think gross, ugly, and overcrowded. Shockingly, this food court was spacious, and modern but comfortable. Large windows provide natural light and a view of students walking below. The color scheme is warm and inviting with splashes of green, orange, red and brown–reminding me of Echo Canyon in Colorado.

court colors like echo canyon

            A number of restaurants line the south side of the court (Quiznos Sub, Stir Fry 88, Nori Japan, and sbarro). The rest of the space is occupied by sections of wood, tile, and carpet flooring. There are dividing walls to break up some of the noise, flat screen TVs hanging with various facings, and a jumble of shiny black tables and green chairs.

            When you’re developing a setting for a story, the smell of fresh breadsticks, or the sizzle of a hot pan remind you to add sensory details. Because the court is one, open space with a high ceiling, voices travel and gather together as a humming sound. A problem I suffer through with smaller coffee shops is the conversation that gets too close to me and becomes a complete distraction. In this space, single voices are indistinct, drowned by the echoes of the masses.

            There’s a section in the middle of the room with comfy chairs. You can find outlets underneath some of the cushioned bench-seating that lines the wall, and there’s free wireless internet! And if I want a drink, I can head over to bubble island, bubble tea (also part of the food court). Hours are 11-11 Mon-Fri and 11-9 Sat & Sun.

            Surprisingly, I found this to be a good place to write!


Snow Day!

-Writing is like a snow day.

            On Tuesday morning the sky was a dense, grayish-white. It looked as an ice cube does when compact, solid, and ready to fall from the tray. The sky cracked open and the shavings of that cube came down. As day became night, heavy flakes were still falling outside, covering the painted blue of my front steps.

-This is how writing often begins for me. An idea builds in my mind, filling my head with thoughts that flow, drifting from somewhere untouchable.

-Those thoughts of what to write become something real and surprising—a story.

            I was working on a paper when my housemate burst into my room (or tried to, since my door sticks). She jumped up and down on my creaky floor as if it was a trampoline. “Snow day! Snow Day!” she was yelling. As quickly as she had come she was gone, spreading the news.

-The writing comes, not caring if the hours it takes were meant for sleep. There is too much excitement for any other activity.

            In a flurry of jubilation, my six other roommates and I threw on our winter mittens and hats. And with little regard for our lack of snow pants, we ran outside into the white!

-You work at the process of writing: choosing words, structure, and putting them in the compacted form of a story.

            One of my roommates yelled, “Snowman!” so we began rolling the snow, placing, gathering, packing it into a form.

-Because you reach challenges, the writing turns into something different from what you had intended, taking on a new design.

            Our snowman was not growing into a snowman, however. We failed at the proper shape. The bottom, body and head clumped together as one large being. And suddenly, he had a sloping, trailing tail. This was no snowman; this was Jabba the Hutt (Star Wars).

-You follow after the words wherever they want to go.

            So we turned Jabba into one side of a snow fort and proceeded to duplicate him on the opposite side of our snow-covered yard.

            After a couple hours of shoveling the accumulation from our neighbor’s yard into our own, building up the sides of the fort, and lying exhausted on beds of ice, we were soaked, cold and ready to go inside. But before we reached the porch—and the end of our revelry—someone threw a snowball!

-The story nears its conclusion and surprises you, lasting longer than you had expected and ending how it sees fit.

            Some neighbors from a house behind us—ones we had never met—wordlessly challenged us to a snowball war. We spent the next hour in childish ecstasy! Cars became trees for hiding behind. The road was an empty no-man’s land. And buses were the common enemy, inviting a volley of packed powder from each side. The battle raged.

-You strip the story of its dragging parts and what’s left is a piece worthy of remembrance.

            When our neighbors finally surrendered, aware of their lack of a base compared with our fortress, we trudged up our steps and into the house. While we shed wet clothes, a smell of mint and cinnamon reached our frozen noses. A pot of flavored hot chocolate was waiting on the stove, ready to warm the numbness of our stiff fingers. We each ladled up a mug. Then we huddled together on our living room couches, laughing at the children we had become.


My English teacher’s wise words

Upon my decision to attend UW Madison, many had advice on places to go, events to attend, or libraries to spend my days at. One family friend told me to always study at College Library, because she met her husband there and she thought, naturally, I would, too. My aunt urged me to go to the Terrace once every week in the summer to get the famous Terrace brats. And my wonderful high school English teacher revealed to me her favorite coffeeshop to go to after the Farmers’ Market: Michelangelo’s.

Now that I’m here, I do study at College Library, but not always, and I haven’t met my husband yet. Maybe he’ll show up one of these days. The Terrace brats are fantastic, though I don’t eat them weekly. What’s interesting about Michelangelo’s, though, is that I do go there often because of my English teacher’s high esteem for it. I guess this is the only advice I actually did follow. And I’m glad I did.

Walking into Michelangelo’s is like walking into a comfortable cottage. The bakery items include delightful cookies, pastries, and cakes, all made that day. The coffee is amazing, and their whipped cream is homemade. They also make their own chai, which is delicious. It’s refreshing to taste something other than the too sweet chai concentrate.

The thing that’s great about Michelangelo’s is that there’s always a place to sit. At other shops on state, sometimes I have to get coffee and then find another coffeeshop to drink it in, but not Michelangelo’s. It has two areas, one in the front, and one larger, more artsy area in the back with an abundance of outlets and bigger tables. The table I always sit at has an outlet that is above the window so I have to stand on the nook below the window to plug my extension cord in, which is comfortingly precarious. The art is fantastic, some even being painted right onto the walls, making it more of a museum than a temporary place to put canvases.

If I run out of cash, they even have a convenient ATM inside their premises, right next to a computer for customer use, which is extremely helpful when I just have to check something when I’m walking up or down State Street. The atmosphere is extremely diverse, which is greatly appreciated right after being to the coastie-infected Starbucks. They also have board games, which are always a wonderful way to spend time. Why do homework when I can play Scrabble?

So, I just want to thank my favorite high school English teacher for enlightening me with such great advice. You were and still are my most wonderful teacher, and I thank you for leading me to the best coffeeshop on State Street. Let’s go play Scrabble!


Steep & Brew: a place where extension cords hang like fruit from a tree

image attributed to althouse.blogspot.com

I spend a lot of time in Steep & Brew, a coffee shop with a black and white awning over its entrance on the 500 block of state street. I even hold my writing fellow meetings here. I like the carpeted east wall and the art collections here. The atmosphere is subdued, but not soporific. I think the understated color scheme is nicely balanced with the paintings hung on the walls, which cycles between local artists. They have nice, natural lighting out in front and a very large, well-lit back room with plenty of tables but which still manages to be spacious.

The reason why I choose to hold my conferences here is because of this spaciousness and because Steep and Brew is one of the quieter coffee shops on state street. There is ample distance between tables so you’re not thrust into an involuntary eavesdropping session. I also wanted a more casual atmosphere to alleviate nervousness and claustrophobia in my tutees.

As for the coffee… Steep and Brew has very strong coffee. Apparently it also has the best breakfast blend in Madison. I also find that the coffee is dark enough for aging paper, if you’re into craft making and antique paper. Actually, I’m quite serious when I say I want to start a series of paintings made with coffee. I would probably start with Steep and Brew blends.

Another awesome thing is the extension cords that hang from one of the pipes in the back room… you can grab one and connect to one of the many outlets available from even the farthest corner of the room. SS is very conscious of and accommodating to laptop-dependent students. Which is great. I love it. Great place to write!

Oh and… one last thing. DELICIOUS FANCY OATMEAL AND BELGIAN WAFFLES FOR $2 or LESS! That is perfect for the budget-conscious Madisonian or UW student.


Authors! Take heed! A list of things that will make an editor cringe

As a publishing intern, I have read my fair share of manuscripts. Some are extraordinary. But then  there are the others. And these others usually have similar missteps. So I decided to make a list of the things that make me want to throw the manuscript out the window. Along with the author.

  • too many adjectives

-If you are using more than five adjectives in a sentence, cut some out. For example, saying that “she glided up the stairs, her flawless, smiling, slightly flushed face hidden beneath a flowing, translucent veil” is over the top. You don’t want your editors to roll their eyes at your excessive use of description.

  • a four-year-old protagonist

-I don’t know how many times I have read something like this. A four-year-old cannot be controlled by his hormones, nor can he be a dominating physical presence. And is it really realistic that this same four-year-old will save the planet? Make your characters reasonable.

  • repeating a color or description

-Using the same color more than three times on a page is illegal. Just kidding. But really. Vary your colors; there are so many wonderful ones! Also, using “tall, dark, and handsome” multiple times is not original, nor does it make me marvel at your creativity. Create your own characters.  

  • ridiculous plots

-If you think your story is getting boring, do not just haphazardly bring some aliens in. This also applies to pirates, zombies, and plagues. Take a break, remind yourself of your overall plotline, and keep writing. You can fix the slow parts after you have finished your manuscript.

When you’re writing your manuscript and you’re about to take that wrong turn, stop! Remember these four things like your life depended on it. Some might be common sense, but you would be surprised at how many people still do them. These slip-ups might be the difference between your manuscript getting published and being flung out the window in frustration.

Most importantly, though, keep writing and keep submitting your work. You never know who will like your story.


Heart’s Blood

            In this recent novel by Juliet Marillier, Caitrin is a young woman determined to escape. When her father dies and abusive relatives take control of her life, Caitrin abandons her home for an uncertain future. Desperate to avoid her relatives’ grasp, she seeks a position as a scribe. The employer, however, is Anluan, a temperamental chieftain of Whistling Tor—a fortress known for its haunting mists and spectral appearances. Tasked with solving a hundred-year-old family curse, Caitrin must learn to trust those who would be friends, and perhaps something more. And maybe, with some guts, a little luck, and some magic, the people of Whistling Tor will be able to make right the wrongs of the past. 

            If you haven’t yet experienced Juliet Marillier’s writing, you’re truly missing out. She is most known for her first novel, Daughter of the Forest, as part of her Sevenwaters Trilogy. But since then, she has continued to write amazing, historical fantasy based on the folklore and mythology of a number of cultures.

            This newest book, Heart’s Blood, lives up to the high standards I have come to expect in her writing style. If I don’t care about the characters in a story, they will fade from my memory and that book will become one among many that I’ve read. With Marillier’s characters, I can’t get rid of them! They follow me everywhere, intruding beyond their own story into mine. I care about them so much that I have never been able to lengthen out a reading of one of Juliet Marillier’s novels. She writes one sitting reads. One sitting of hoping, laughing, possibly some tearing up, with an occasional loud outburst of surprise!

            When I see she has a new book to be released, I have to cross that day off of my calendar. Even if I attempt not to, I always gravitate toward the bookstore on that date.

            And, her books are far from being cast as sappy romances solely for the female sex. Her plots are complex, mysterious, thrilling, and filled with action as well as romance. Wolfskin, told from the male perspective of a Norse warrior, became my brother’s favorite book after I suggested he read it.

            For anyone who enjoys a heart-pounding, character-driven fantasy, Juliet Marillier is a definite yes! 

Author’s Website


Literary Movies (book adaptations)

After coming across an interesting list online someone compiled of what they thought were the best literary movies, I started listing off in my head the ones I have seen, including ones that were not in the list. I’ve decided to materialize this list for fun in the wonderful world of word laundry. Here tumbles:

(not in any particular order of preference)

  1. Little Women (Too sweet and cozy. But it’s based on actual events, which was interesting. I have not read the book, and now I don’t want to.)
  2. Everything is Illuminated (JSF is one of my favorite authors but the movie didn’t do anything for me. I kept thinking of Frodo the whole time and it was distracting. IMO it was trying too hard to be quirky and indie and it was more of a book “inspired” movie than an adaptation.)
  3. Wuthering Heights ’92 (love the book, like the movie)
  4. Pride and Prejudice (My roommate wants to kill me because I’m not hot for either the book or the movie, and I am not in love with Colin Firth. Why does everyone think he’s so hot? Boring!)
  5. Peter Pan (the new movie? I love it. And I’m sad it wasn’t a hit. There was some kind of scandal involving people getting upset over the “lustful” moments between Wendy and Peter. I really don’t think the commotion was warranted. It’s a lovely, visually rich film. Hook gets stomped by this one. I think J Sumpter is the ultimate Peter. I prefer his portrayal over the others I’ve seen, including the Disney version)
  6. Lord of the Rings (I haven’t finished the book series. But I went through the obligatory high school geek obsession with LOTR because of the movies.)
  7. Harry Potter (I like the soundtrack. Liked the books when I was younger. The movies are comforting.)
  8. Persuasion (Like I said, I’m not into Jane Austen. This was ok.)
  9. Anne of Green Gables (Nostalgia.)
  10. The Notebook (Noooooo way. I will never watch this movie again. The last 15 minutes were okay… when they died. I don’t like “chick flicks”)
  11. The Chronicles of Narnia (I like magical creatures. I think I will go back to the series at some point.)
  12. Breakfast at Tiffany’s (I didn’t even realize this was a book adaptation until today. It was pretty good. I can see why so many guys have a crush on Audrey.)
  13. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (I’ve only seen the Johnny Depp version and while it’s visually striking, the movie seemed to be missing something. The oompa loompas were terrible.)
  14. The English Patient (The poetic elements of the book I feel were not translated into the film.)
  15. The Godfather (could not finish the movie or the book.)
  16. Sin City (Amazing. Made me want to be an artist… ok graphic novels shouldn’t be on the list, but it’s here anyway.)
  17. Clockwork Orange (I can see why it’s an important film, but I did not enjoy it on any level. I could not get past the first page of the book either.)
  18. Trainspotting (worth watching.)
  19. Bridget Jones’s Diary (One of a handful of “girly” movies I can bear to watch.)
  20. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (The book was better, but the movie was fun to watch. Very colorful.)
  21. Gone with the Wind (My mother loved this movie even though she hardly speaks english.)
  22. 2001: a Space Odyssey (I think this was ruined for me because it is such a cultural icon, I’ve seen the whole movie in parody before I ever saw the film itself… and it didn’t work.)
  23. War of the Worlds (I would watch this up to 3 times)
  24. The Wizard of Oz (Yay!)
  25. The Princess Bride (Again, my roommate wants to kill me.)

Comfort in Ink

I don’t know about you, but I could probably spend my entire day at a bookstore. One entire day surrounded by that wonderful almond smell of paper and fresh ink. It would begin at the opening time, probably around 8 am, as I opened the doors. I would feel the rush of warm air as I walked in from the cold winter morning. Then I would hear the quiet murmurs and the shrill beeps of the scanners, reminding me that I could take any of these books home (yes!). I would then feast my eyes on the bright, gleaming book covers only a glance away from the front doors as they shone their spotlights onto me, beckoning me to come and look at them.

And, obviously, I would listen, and rush over to the new releases table, breathing in every shining cover, flipping through the first couple of pages of some to judge my level of interest. Now wait a second. Let me make a side note about interest. Don’t you think it’s completely illogical that while we are taught as tiny, innocent children that we should “never judge a book by its cover,” this is precisely what we proceed to do from that moment forward? Think about it. When you are looking for a new book to read, you don’t take each book and examine its insides; on the contrary, you skim over the covers and the titles, and if one catches your eye by its color combination, font decorum, or title appeal, you retrieve it from the shelf to learn more about it. Only after you have determined that its cover has impressed you enough do you venture to open it. Weird, right? Ok, back into it then.

Read the rest of this entry »


Publishing Your Work: Don’t Submit That Yet!

You have it in your hand, and you’re about to mail it. Or, it’s in your email, and you’re about to send it. But please, don’t submit it yet!

            When submitting your work to be published, there are some things you should know . . .

  • The Right Publisher

–          If you have written a serious memoir of your life, don’t send it to a Science Fiction/Fantasy publisher. Find the right avenue for your piece of writing.

  • Cover Letter

–          If you have met an editor before, remind that person of where you met and what you had discussed at the time.

–          Include something that stands out about your piece. Why is it a good sell for the current reading market?

  • Don’t Exaggerate

–          People who are looking at submissions can tell a boast before their eyes have finished scanning the page. Don’t compare your writing to bestselling works. You will only induce whoever’s looking to roll their eyes and sigh.

  • Don’t Cheat

–          Submitting your piece to multiple publishing houses or venues at the same time is a bad idea. Why should one editor take the time to look at your work when another editor has already accepted you?

  • Enquire

–          If it has been some time since you have submitted something, you may politely enquire as to the status of your work. But, keep in mind that editors receive multiple, unrequested submissions every day. They can’t drop what they’re doing in order to immediately satisfy you. You are not their first priority.

  • Formatting

–          Generally, whoever you’re sending your work to should have information on how they want you to submit. Always look at these guidelines first.

–           A publisher will usually ask for a physical manuscript if it’s a longer piece. Printing is expensive and just adds one more step to getting your writing published.

–          When you send a manuscript, it should be double-spaced, 12 pt. standard font, on white paper, unbound, and anything meant to be in italics should be underlined instead.         

–          Don’t forget to add a running head with your name, the title of the piece, and the page number!

–          Include a short summary of your manuscript (less than four pages).

  • Be Professional

–          Check, and recheck for grammatical errors, especially in your cover letter. Don’t use an informal tone. An editor won’t take you seriously.

  • Contact Information

–          If you are currently at a temporary address, make sure to include permanent contact information, if only an email address. Your work may lay unread for some time. If some intern finally picks it up, loves it, and wants to contact you but your information is outdated, you’ve missed your shot!

Only after you have checked off all of these things may you even consider pushing that button or stamping that package. Don’t send writing that you’ll just get back!


Reflections on the Writing Workshop

Last week, my college roommate burst into my room with a loud wail and a bunch of papers which she proceeded to dump on my already document-strewn bed. She positioned herself in a pose reminiscent of the “child’s pose” in yoga, something akin to a cat stretch with her arms out front and her body curled into an egg on the mattress, her head down, sniffing into my notebook. She was frustrated by her poetry workshop, she said, because her peer comments were unhelpful. “They don’t know what they’re talking about! I can’t bear to look at them!” she wailed, “It’s all a huge waste of time!” I was amused by her dramatic elocutions, but her frustration was by no means an anomaly among undergraduate in the creative writing department.

It is not easy to come up with a simple solution to this problem, and I know from personal experience and other conversations with fellow writers that frustration with workshops is common. Advanced writers in advanced undergraduate workshops are disappointed by the quality of peer comments in workshop, and assert that nobody (but they!) knows what they’re doing even though they’ve been through the whole system, from the introductory course through the advanced. These days, I have a different attitude towards the issue where I used to wax the same as my wailing roommate. Much of critique in workshop may not be profound and groundbreaking, but it is a court where diverse voices may be heard, and one can choose to take the advice, think about it, or not. My mother once told me that if there were more than two other people in the room, chances are, at least one of them will have something worthwhile to teach you. Something that sounds unsophisticated or nitpicky may be a sign of a potentially problematic pattern in your work. I think that my roommate’s frustration also stemmed from the suspicion that her fellow workshop members were not as well read or aesthetically refined as she. But whenever issues like this come up, when it is a question of something as subjective as taste in literature, there is no way to find a satisfactory gauge or solution to the problem.

Undergraduate workshops are not as selective as graduate workshops, and it is simply something each undergraduate writer will have to accept: that they will be thrust into dialog with a variety of skill-levels and aesthetic styles. While it is impossible, and not a good idea anyway, to make a world where everyone had good, elitist, and similar taste in literature, there are ways to create a middle ground where students are at least all equally proficient at peer critique, and the art of reading and responding to any piece of writing intelligently and efficiently. So what gets in the way of this productive middle ground? In my own university workshop experience at UW Madison, I have noticed that students often flounder during critique because they are distracted by irrelevant details, and do not know exactly what to look for. This may be due to the fact that they are unaware of the wider world of contemporary creative writing in general. Many workshop students have only been exposed to the standardized literary canon, which I think is objectively exclusive and certainly not representative of the true face of poetic history. Workshops usually do have a good syllabus in terms of texts for students to read, but the scope of a single class is unfortunately narrow, and the time allotted to talking about the texts too little. Read the rest of this entry »